The use of tazers, as weapons
for behavioral control is becoming alarming, as well as increasingly
controversial because of the number of deaths associated with their usage. To many people, death related to the use of tazers as
weapons appears to be cruel, harsh and senseless. It is important to
understand what a tazer is and how it functions as a weapon. Is the use of a
tazer acceptable, or are there better answers for behavior control?
What is a tazer?
“Tasers are hand-held weapons
that deliver a jolt of electricity through a pair of wires propelled by
compressed air from up to 10.6 metres away.”
“The jolt stuns the target by
causing an uncontrollable contraction of the muscle tissue. The target is
immobilized and falls to the ground — regardless of pain tolerance or mental
focus.”
What does the word Taser mean?
“Taser stands for "Thomas
A. Swift Electric Rifle."
The question becomes one of
whether electric rifles are acceptable as weapons used in behavior control.
Unlike a rifle, the tazer administers an electro-shock to its target.
Should tazers be used?
Deaths associated with or
related to the use of tazers as weapons raise some serious issues. Is the actual cause of death in each instance the
electroshock administered with a tazer or are there other factors involved?
“Some psychologists say the
cause is a rare condition called "excited
delirium" and not the obvious common element — the use of a Taser.”
What is excited
delirium?
“According to some
psychologists, a person with excited delirium acts agitated, violent, sweats
profusely and is unusually strong and insensitive to pain. Then, the victim's
heart races and eventually stops beating.”
These symptoms can be associated with other things, like a sudden release of adrenalin
associated with fear, unusual activity, as well as various kinds of substance
abuse.
Consider this example.
A person having done something
socially unacceptable like robbing a bank could have a sudden release of
adrenalin, while he or she is on some kind of a substance that alters behavior. Targeted and hit with the tazer
as a weapon, he or she could die. Which would be the cause of death?
Under normal circumstances,
behavior control of any kind is not associated with a death or a death
sentence, which could be the result of a severe, electric shock administered
with a tazer. In this case, it is also associated with a sudden release of
adrenalin and substance abuse.
Electroshock therapy, with
respect to the behavior modification of psychiatric patients, has been used for
many years. Note that electroshock therapy could be fatal as well, depending
upon the intensity of the electro-shock administered.
The same basic principle
applies to tazers. Is it a relatively mild electro-shock administered by a
tazer or an intense one?
Any weapon that could or does
inflict death upon a person, should be subject to severe scrutiny. In
terms of psychiatry, the practice has been carefully monitored, as well as
documented in the form of medical records.
The use of tazers may endanger
the life of the individuals and thus, tazering is not an appropriate form of
behavior control. One must argue that less severe measures would appear to be
more appropriate than the use of tazers.
No comments:
Post a Comment