In
mental health, diagnoses are important. For example, consider the word
'borderline'. It means just that. For example, the perimeter of one country is
the same as another, but not one or the other country. It delineates both, but
there is nothing definitive in terms of territory. Borderline does
not fit into the realm of either hither or yon. This might also signify
displacement.
Where
black meets white in terms of color, there is a gray borderline. Where night
meets day, there is a borderline and it can be a gray area, too. In mental
health, the gray area can depict the realm of the unknown or in terms of a
whole person, the unknown realm of the mind, soul, body or spirit. Maybe it
is not gray at all, but more akin to the realm of rainbow colors.
Instinctively,
we seek to label 'borderline' as something, anything or whatever. Without
a name, it is useless. It cannot be defined or can it? It is not one, not the
other. There is no 'is' about it, much less 'is not'. It is the 'almost' or
'not quite' region.
Should
we medicalize it or perhaps medicalize everything? That way there can be a
diagnosis, but it still remains vague and non-inclusive.
Magnify
it. Whatever you choose to magnify grows. If it gets large enough, it might
have a name too. Everything big has a name.
Put
it in the mental health realm, but it is not mental health or mental illness,
either.
Assign
some characteristics to it, whatever suits your fancy. At least that way,
it is in a box. Boxes are containers and things fit into them. Borderline
fits into a box perhaps, by virtue of its perimeter or perimeters. Or does
it?
There
is a fine line between 'borderline' and 'split'. One is not the other; the
other is not the one. There is no division in 'borderline'. It has unity, even
if only as a single, stable or unstable black line or maybe it is white. Better
still, it can be gray or rainbow colors.
Maybe
'borderline' fits better in a circle. Everything that is outside of the
border is not in the circle or part of the 'borderline'. Or is
it? Everything inside the circle is not part of the 'borderline', either.
Or is it?
Isn't
the 'borderline' part of both the outside and the inside? Maybe it is
simply the uniting factor.
Is
the secret, the unifying-dividing power of the 'borderline'? It can be
labeled this and that, but not this and not that. Joining and separating.
Uniting and dividing? Joining and separating? Holding everything together and
keeping it apart?
Just
more evidence of a complex whole.
One
can only ask what this means in terms of a mental health diagnosis. From a
wholistic/holistic perspective, it might even make sense.
No comments:
Post a Comment